header image

Menu:

Last updated:
  12 June 2009

Working Papers

Economic Crises and Income Inequality

Financial crises are common in market economies.  While the initial impact of a crisis is harmful for an economy, recent research suggests that risky behavior of investors - one of the main causes of crises - can have long-run positive impacts for an economy through increased investment during non-crisis times. On average, the long-run positive effect of this investment has been found to be greater than the initial decreases in wealth during a crisis; rare crises are in fact beneficial to economies. However, this positive effect is not necessarily equal for all groups within a nation. This paper explores how rare, systemic economic crises affect inequality within nations. Rare crises are found to significantly increase inequality, even when controlling for the income level of nations. Crises lead to an increase in the income share of the top 20% of people in a nation, while they have a negative effect on the share of income of the lowest 40% large enough to suggest that the poor receive no, or even negative, benefit from the positive effects of investment growth. This differential effect is found to be partly due to a quick return of financial profits and a decrease in the growth rate of employment after a crisis.

The Consequences of Forced Migration in Northern Uganda

Households in Conflict Network (HiCN) Working Paper 65

Over 21 million people are currently forced to live in internally displaced person (IDP) camps around the world. The consequences of such a movement of people has meant a severe impact on the populations, though little is known about the exact impact on health, mortality rates and livelihoods of this forced migration. The conflict in northern Uganda offers the opportunity to use exogenous variation in forced movement in order to control for endogenous factors and thus give unbiased estimates of the cost of movement. In the short-term, forced movement has had a significant positive impact on mortality rates through improved access to health care but a significant negative effect on the assets and consumption patterns of the people. This could have important implications on the long-term success of the people.